A weak government typically has limited powers and lacks control over its citizens and institutions. It may struggle to enforce laws and maintain stability. Conversely, a strong government has extensive powers and authority to govern its citizens effectively, enforce laws, and maintain order and stability. It is capable of making and implementing policies efficiently.
many ways duhhh
No. The confederation created by Articles of Confederation was designed to have a weak central government and a strong state government.
Confedration
The republicans thought they should follow the articles of confederation and have a weak central government The federalists thought there should be a strong central government
There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on a variety of factors, including the specific country in question and the particular type of government. However, in general, governments with a weak national government are considered to be less effective and less stable than those with a strong national government. This is because a weak national government is less able to effectively manage the country's affairs and to protect the rights and interests of its citizens. In addition, a weak national government is more likely to be overthrown by a strong, centralized government.
pete sakes
a weak- mayor system . no wear near a strong one
No. The confederation created by Articles of Confederation was designed to have a weak central government and a strong state government.
The Articles of Confederation had a Weak National Government. The U.S. had a Federal Sytem Government ( Or strong Government )
Confedration
Strong council-weak mayor.
The Articles of Confederation were weak and did not even give a semi-strong Government.